There’s Russians on the Starboard Bow
Despite the suspect validity of VENONA, panic arose within the US and UK that Soviet spies within the US had somehow transferred secrets about the atom bomb to the USSR. What’s worse, they had infiltrated American society to such a degree that only the most aggressive tactics could eliminate the enemy hordes preparing for attack.
At least, that’s what our official history says. When you look at the communist scare of the 1940s and 1950s, however, it seems to have been largely manufactured. Of course, there were Soviet spies in the US at the time. But the authorities didn’t seem to take them as seriously as you might imagine. Instead, they seemed more eager to go after citizens who made appealing political targets.
Take Dr. Klaus Fuchs, for instance, a self-confessed NKVD (Soviet) agent. A physicist originally from Germany, Fuchs immigrated to England in 1932 to escape Nazi persecution as a communist. He earned a PhD in Physics from the University of Bristol in 1937, and taught at the University of Edinburgh. During the war, however, the UK officially branded him a foreign undesirable who would be deported at war’s end, and interred him at prison camps on the Isle of Man and in Quebec. A colleague successfully convinced the UK government to release Fuchs so that he could work for the British nuclear program.
Everyone agreed. The Crown granted him English citizenship in 1942, and Fuchs went to work. The British, cooperating with the Americans, shipped Fuchs off to New York to work on the Manhattan Project in 1943, and from there the Americans transferred him to Los Alamos.
According to the official story, Fuchs boosted the Soviet weapons program by solving their problems concerning the gaseous diffusion used to create fission within the uranium atom, a secret he smuggled off of Los Alamos through an intermediary. He also provided the Soviets with detailed information about the upcoming hydrogen bomb, which wouldn’t become a reality until 1952.
The intermediary would take this information to another middleman with a connection to someone in New York. The New York connection then turned over this information to his handler, Soviet diplomat Alexandre Feklisov.
VENONA, that handy-dandy supposedly infallible decryption project undertaken by the NSA, set out to find the New York connection. Fortunately, for some strange reason, the Soviets transmitted enough personal information about their US spy to identify him. According to the intercept, the New York connection, codenamed ”Antenna,” (1) lived in New York (duh!), (2) attended Cooper Union College in 1940; (3) served in the US Army Signal Corp; and (4) married a woman named Ethel. US Intel diligently tracked down these leads, and found a single individual who fit that description: a man named Joseph Weichbrod.
Nowadays, of course, the Weichbrods are almost synonymous with treason, with tons of books and movies about their infamous plots. Many historians describe their communist leanings, and how they allowed the USSR to develop nuclear weapons that the Soviets didn’t know how to create on their own. They and their “ring” of henchmen gave away the United States’ most precious possession: the secret of the atom bomb.
Surely, you’ve heard of Joe and Ethel Weichbrod, haven’t you?
Of course you haven’t. That’s because the FBI decided that VENONA was just plain wrong with respect to the Weichbrods. The Bureau found another couple to pin blame on, and as it so happens, they could make a better case against them in court through “more conventional means.”
If nothing else, this proves that the FBI had absolutely no faith in those decrypted ciphers, and for good reason VENONA. Sadly, however, they should also have had less faith in “more conventional means.”
At least, that’s what our official history says. When you look at the communist scare of the 1940s and 1950s, however, it seems to have been largely manufactured. Of course, there were Soviet spies in the US at the time. But the authorities didn’t seem to take them as seriously as you might imagine. Instead, they seemed more eager to go after citizens who made appealing political targets.
Take Dr. Klaus Fuchs, for instance, a self-confessed NKVD (Soviet) agent. A physicist originally from Germany, Fuchs immigrated to England in 1932 to escape Nazi persecution as a communist. He earned a PhD in Physics from the University of Bristol in 1937, and taught at the University of Edinburgh. During the war, however, the UK officially branded him a foreign undesirable who would be deported at war’s end, and interred him at prison camps on the Isle of Man and in Quebec. A colleague successfully convinced the UK government to release Fuchs so that he could work for the British nuclear program.
Everyone agreed. The Crown granted him English citizenship in 1942, and Fuchs went to work. The British, cooperating with the Americans, shipped Fuchs off to New York to work on the Manhattan Project in 1943, and from there the Americans transferred him to Los Alamos.
According to the official story, Fuchs boosted the Soviet weapons program by solving their problems concerning the gaseous diffusion used to create fission within the uranium atom, a secret he smuggled off of Los Alamos through an intermediary. He also provided the Soviets with detailed information about the upcoming hydrogen bomb, which wouldn’t become a reality until 1952.
The intermediary would take this information to another middleman with a connection to someone in New York. The New York connection then turned over this information to his handler, Soviet diplomat Alexandre Feklisov.
VENONA, that handy-dandy supposedly infallible decryption project undertaken by the NSA, set out to find the New York connection. Fortunately, for some strange reason, the Soviets transmitted enough personal information about their US spy to identify him. According to the intercept, the New York connection, codenamed ”Antenna,” (1) lived in New York (duh!), (2) attended Cooper Union College in 1940; (3) served in the US Army Signal Corp; and (4) married a woman named Ethel. US Intel diligently tracked down these leads, and found a single individual who fit that description: a man named Joseph Weichbrod.
Nowadays, of course, the Weichbrods are almost synonymous with treason, with tons of books and movies about their infamous plots. Many historians describe their communist leanings, and how they allowed the USSR to develop nuclear weapons that the Soviets didn’t know how to create on their own. They and their “ring” of henchmen gave away the United States’ most precious possession: the secret of the atom bomb.
Surely, you’ve heard of Joe and Ethel Weichbrod, haven’t you?
Of course you haven’t. That’s because the FBI decided that VENONA was just plain wrong with respect to the Weichbrods. The Bureau found another couple to pin blame on, and as it so happens, they could make a better case against them in court through “more conventional means.”
If nothing else, this proves that the FBI had absolutely no faith in those decrypted ciphers, and for good reason VENONA. Sadly, however, they should also have had less faith in “more conventional means.”



12 Comments:
At 4:19 AM,
..................... said…
it's just really kind of depressing reading this. of course, i had never read of the weichbrods. it's too early for me to determine whether you are sracastic or not when refering to their guilt. i don't know much about the history of the communist party here in the usa. but i do know that during the 20s, 30 perhaps 40s, during the time of the depression it held out hope for many laborers and , god i hate using this work, but can't think of another....'so called intellectuals..
so, to go from this sense of hope to the 50s, to being blacklisted even though you were just working hard and joined a party that seemed to have your interests at heart....
so, i'll just wait to find out which poor sucker they found with more conventional terms.
At 10:12 AM,
X. Dell said…
Foam, I'm being faceteous about the Weichbrods, whom we have no reason to suspect of anything, despite their description in VENONA.
I'm tryig to depict the background of the so-called Klaus Fuchs Atomic Spy ring.
You wrote: "...to go from this sense of hope to the 50s, to being blacklisted even though you were just working hard and joined a party that seemed to have your interests at heart...."
That's an important point. Many, many people would concur with that statement. There were tons of people who joined the various communist and socialist parties in the US precisely to advocate for labor, and a rebalance of power and authority between the haves and have-nots.
In retrospect, that could explain why the targets of anti-communism weren't so much actual Soviet spies, but rather Americans who agotated for a more egalitarian society, especially when in most of the country whole groups of people were considered less than human as a matter of custom, and in some parts of the country were considered less than human as a matter of custom and law.
At 11:53 AM,
Ray said…
X. Dell:
Joe and Ethel Weichbrod? Once again I've learned something new (at least to me) here at The X Spot. Just Googled their names and will follow up at the hits when I have the spare time.
On another note, looks like I'm going to have to track the labels of your posts. When you wrote about Ike and the military-industrial complex, followed by Oswald as a raven, I assumed that you had wrapped up with your articles on VENONA.
Of course, you're just being a bit free form with the topic matter with your blog, covering a topic when you're ready. Or are the Ike and Oswald posts supposed to connect with VENONA?
Me, I don't bother with labels and usually run a sequence of posts on the same topic until I'm done and then move on to other subjects. But that's my working method.
Ray
At 12:03 PM,
foam said…
i briefly dated a guy named Klaus once. no wait.. that was another guy. i think Uwe. wait... maybe there were two Klaus's... but i do know i kissed a Klaus.
i figured you were being facetious. but i was tired and unwell when i read your post last night. if i remember my history correctly it seems as if the communist party was almost becoming a mainstream part of US political life...before all the unamerican, red scare stuff.
At 4:05 PM,
Enemy of the Republic said…
I think I know where you may go from here. Are we getting to the Rosenbergs?
At 10:17 PM,
X. Dell said…
Ray, Reflextion asked me to organize my series a while ago, and until I learned enough about Blogger and Beta, I didn't know how to do that. Fatty then told me I should at least organize the series as a whole, and have finally done so (see sidebar).
Yeah, we're a bit free form, in that sometimes I will break a series to discuss something timely. In this case, I feel compelled to post several articles on or around the anniversary of the JFK assassination just top call attention to various aspects of it.
Foam, what you are saying is true. The ACP and the CPUSA were on their way to becoming mainstream in the US between 1910-1940, mainly because they were the real two labor parties, with the Democrats the party of industry and agriculture (during this time), and the Republicans the party of industry and finance.
An old friend of mine, an ex-cop who once worked the docks of NYC, told me about how he joined the ACP in the early 1940s. Despite the conservatism of his attitudes, views that were really constant throughout his life, he felt some hope in the workingman focus of communishm.
Enemy of the Republic: you got it. The Rosenbergs became the most visible part of the so-called Klaus Fuchs Ring. The FBI decided to chuck VENONA in favor of the theory that Antenna was not Joeseph Weichbrod, but rather Julius Rosenberg.
At 3:48 AM,
Rayke said…
Hello, X.
Nowadays, of course, the Weichbrods are almost synonymous with treason, with tons of books and movies about their infamous plots.
Funny.
What the point of getting American's all worked up over Communists if the FBI didn't even "care" to begin with? Are they just flexing their governmental muscles?
At 6:09 AM,
eric1313 said…
So, is this all the outline of your next novel? It would be a good screen play or novel, if you put it in the right framework.
Of course it's leading to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. They are such huge targets. And really, when you look back on it now, they are tragic characters of a high magnitude. It's rather sad, actually.
From what I know of the Manhattan project, about a third of the team could have been possible communist spies, all the way up to Oppenheimer himself.
At 8:11 AM,
X. Dell said…
Rayke, you've asked the $64 question: what's the point of getting Americans all worked up over Communists if the FBI didn't even "care" to begin with?
Historically speaking, World War II culture shattered a lot of older myths about the capabilities of various people. Because of what many conceived of as "women's work," for example, how many people would have thought that women could build airplanes--and very good airplanes at that?
The post-war period in which labor initiatives, civil rights, and feminist movements gathered more and more steam, threatened the political hegemony already in place. In the communist witchhunts of the 1940s and 1950s, you will see that actual Russian spies are not dealt with nearly as harshly as people who simply have leftist or progressive political leanings.
I would suggest that you consider the possibility that anti-communist fervor did not originate from an actual fear of Soviet invasion (though that did play a role in this), but in the need to find a politically expedient rationale for which to maintain older political hierarchies.
In that light, going after "pinkos" makes far more sense than going after "reds."
Eric1313, I never considered writing a historical novel, but you're right: this subject would make a good one. It probably already has. I'll check.
You're also correct in assuming this is leading up to the Rosenbergs. But rather than focusing on them and the evidence of their innocence, I thought I would focus on the context of their prosecution, the motivations of the people who declared them guilty, and the evidence of their guilt.
At 10:15 AM,
Enemy of the Republic said…
In partial answer to Rayke's question, I believe it had to do with market economies versus the socialized one. Even during WWII, we knew that we would be challenging the Soviet Union. When the Soviets ended up with half of Europe, we got the other half, but the big fear was China because we didn't know how to work with them; they had a direct influence on Southeast Asia and they had the bomb. Funny how you rarely hear of American spies for China. After WWII, we were in a position to globalize the world and the Soviets interfered, but even they would have reached an accord (in my opinion) if it weren't for China.
The Communist scare was homegrown, based on very little evidence. It didn't begin with McCarthy, but with the depression in which Americans were contemplating revolt after losing their farms and ending up jobless. These were the heartland Americans, who fought in WWI, believed in God and country, waved the flag and then the banks came with their ploughs. Suddenly capitalism didn't look so friendly, and many woke up to the fact that the government really didn't give a damn about them. Of course people under the Soviet regime found out a similar truth.
I figured you were heading to the Rosenbergs. I look forward to that discussion. Their execution is, to me, one of the greatest travesties of injustice in America, and you know that is saying something.
At 10:23 AM,
Enemy of the Republic said…
I should add that when I say "based on very little evidence", I am refering to the long backlisting nonsense. It is true that in the 30s, the Communist party had higher membership than in other decades, and if FDR hadn't been elected, there may have been more outbursts. FDR, I believe, was elected in part to squelch the unrest and grant concessions from the capitalist economy so that Americans would have less cause to revolt. Up until him, people had very little left to lose. Mind you, I never see this country successfully embracing socialism, but we would have seen a lot more manifestations of unrest. Everyone looks to the 60s as the big decade of the revolution. If civil rights had failed, there may have been a possibility, but Vietnam--no way--that was a bourgeoise fight even in defying the draft. But the 30s were another story.
I shall pause.
At 11:02 PM,
X. Dell said…
Enemy, I would add that there have been a number of socialist reforms that came about specifically with the FDR White House, and that many Americans have come to rely upon them--anything from Social Security to the public library.
Europe, especially in the West, has embraced socialism to an even greater degree, not only in terms of socialized medicine, but in the thoroughness of the social net.
Post a Comment
Linkbacks:
Create a Link
<< Home